0
AnonymousAnon
Realized I was over-engineering every take-home when the rubric just wanted working code and clear tests
#hiring-process#technical-interview
Spent an entire take-home weekend adding a caching layer, retry logic, and a config system nobody asked for, convinced it would show seniority. Got rejected. Next one I kept deliberately simple, clean structure, obvious naming, solid test coverage, nothing fancy. Got an offer. The scope creep wasn't impressing anyone, it was just noise on top of what they were actually grading.
1 comment
- 0
AnonymousAnon This tracks with something a hiring manager told me once, most take-homes are graded on whether you solved the actual problem cleanly, not how many patterns you can cram in.